As a regular reader of Heather Armstrong’s Dooce, I’ve been following her foray into the 21-Day Cleanse touted by Oprah et als, designed to - in Oprah’s words - “give me a chance to think about it differently and see what my attachments are to certain kinds of foods.” The cleanse asks you to give up all animal products (meat, dairy, and eggs), gluten, refined sugars and booze for 21 days. It sounded like a good idea to me, but I can’t give up booze. The freshly-stocked bourbon cabinet would cry.
Now, this post - written a couple of days ago about eight days into Heather’s cleanse - shows the Cleanse’s ugly side. Yes, it may make you more mindful about eating (as she points out, she’s already seeing her food differently), but it will also make you sick.
This business about the cleanse irks me tremendously, particularly since it is turning a very reasonable attitude toward eating into another Oprah-endorsed crash diet. While Heather indicated that she wasn’t engaging in the cleanse to lose weight, but to develop that mindful attitude, her latest post on the topic implies that deprivation of this cleansing sort does not help anything, and does nothing for your health.
For some reason, this has struck a nerve because I’ve begun what will probably be a life-long struggle with my weight. Once I turned 21, my formerly fast (and unhealthy) rocket metabolism - able to survive only on 44oz sodas, full pots of coffee, and little food - crunched to a halt. In the space of a year, I gained 20 pounds and was a healthful 135 pounds at my wedding. Once we got married, though, the stress of my crazy jobs at Regis (can you pick up the summer conference program? Sure? It begins next week, and did I mention you won’t be adequately compensated?), seminary, and living in the residence halls among the uncivilized led to a steady gain of between 40 and 50 pounds (depending). At my heaviest, I’ve weighed 180 pounds. That’s a lot of pressure to put on a 5′ 6″, 20-something frame.
I wasn’t a desperate dieter, but I struggled to put together a way of eating that curbed the desire for fast food and entire boxes of Swiss Cake Rolls (you have a stressful night at school and not be a smoker. Swiss Cake Rolls helped me cope).
As it turns out, the best “diet” advice I have received was not from Women’s Health (to which I subscribe), but it came from Michael Pollan’s The Omnivore’s Dilemma. I read this book in the fall of 2006. In the section on corn, Pollan talks about high fructose corn syrup, which is as near a manufactured and legal poison as anything. His description of HFCS and other artificial ingredients (and our unconscious addiction to these things … like our completely artificial sense of sweetness) was enough to make me manic about what was in our pantry. It’s not quite in everything (Target’s Market Pantry Multigrain Bread doesn’t have it, but many other “whole grain breads” do have it), but darn near and so we finished the food with the junk in it and started replacing it with fruits, vegetables, whole grains, grind-it-yourself peanut butter and olives. I’m still game for the refined carbohydrate - have you ever eaten my Mother-in-Law’s Rice Pilaf? Had the Corned Beef and Cabbage at our local Pub? - but for the most part we eat pretty naturally. All because I did some reading and gained a clear intellectual understanding of what was happening. Unless you buy the cleanse book, you rely on Oprah’s blog. She doesn’t explain to you the damage HFCS is doing to your internal organs and its generous contribution to that spare tire you’re carrying around.
Pollan’s book turned me into a rabid label-reader. We both committed to cutting the preservatives and artificial sugars out of our diet. I was able to join the gym at campus and managed to lose somehwere between 12 and 15 pounds over the course of seven months. The combination isn’t a quick-fix, something pretty antithetical to our culture of instant results and convenience.
(Of course, it doesn’t hurt that we are a household with two incomes and no kids. Pollan discusses the challenge facing our culture when preservative-packed foods are the ones that families can reasonably afford … there’s something of a class dimension to this discussion, for sure.)
In a later magazine article for the NYT Magazine, Pollan wrote a long treatise - what would eventually become his latest book, In Defense of Food - that included a couple of rules that should govern our food intake: (1) don’t eat anything your great, great-grandmother wouldn’t recognize as food; (2) don’t eat food that has been anti-oxidant or omega-3 enhanced - get that stuff from natural sources as much as possible; (3) don’t eat anything that has more than five ingredients (this one is hard, but it’s a good “standard candle”).
When things are reasonably stable, I’m able to abide by these rules. It’s those marathon Heidegger final exams that set things awry. It’s not about buying organic (although I do when it’s cost-effective) per se, but it is about eating a lot of vegetables, eating meat and fish in reasonable quantities, enjoying milk and eggs, and avoiding the Swiss Cake Rolls.
Eggs cracked over cooked pasta makes a delicious sauce. Just so you know.
Recent Comments